LinuxForYou have a post on the iLUG-BOM archives which is kind of strange and incomplete. Especially, This month we have chosen the topic: What would make a Windows user pick up a Linux magazine?. Kind of spooky to ask a LUG mailing list about why a Windows user might pick up a Linux magazine. Is LFY trying to do some very basic marketing research through the LUG and passing on the burden to the mailing lists ? Or is it a serious attempt by the magazine to change itself ? For what it is worth, the magazine has been going through a steady yoyo in quality of content. Save and except for the fact that it contains adverstisement from a large number of Indian businesses doing FLOSS/Linux, the pages are strangely bereft of content which proves that folks have written them after working on the various applications/OS. The advertisement bit is interesting since a base level researcher can make out the rising number of folks who are getting applications around the OS out in the market. And without passing any adverse comment on the scalability or the QA of the applications, the trend is fascinating if only the robustness of the applications were guaranteed.
The content quality of the magazine is what distresses me. Instead of improving through the issues, there is a distinct lack of editorial control on the tone and tenor of the magazine as well the layout. With an intermittent sprinkling of articles from various other magazines, the lack of control becomes jarring for an easy read. And someone ought to take a better look at the New Horizons Linux FAQ column. Pathetic would be a too gently word for it.